|
Reprint from The Hobstar, January 1990, Page 1
VAUPEL ENGRAVED GLASS IN AMERICAN MUSEUMS
by Carl U. Fauster
Louis F. Vaupel
(18241903) was a skilled glass engraver when he immigrated to America in 1850. He
found work at the New England Glass Works at Cambridge, Massachusetts, where he became the
designer and head of the engravers until Edward Drunimond Libbey moved the factory to
Toledo, Ohio, in 1888 and changed its name to Libbey Glass Company. Vaupel did not move
with the other workers because of his wifes very poor health and the fact that he
owned residential property in Cambridge. He remained there, continuing to do commissioned
engraving with the wheels in his home until he died in 1903. Louis Vaupels work was
considered to be of museum quality by experts, with his Masterpiece Chalice labeled as the
high point in American Middle Period engraved glass.
When the Libbey Glass Co. approached its 150th Anniversary in 1968, it was my good
fortune as Advertising Manager to be involved in plans to commemorate this milestone in
the firms history. The outstanding event would be a major exhibition, "Libbey
Glass, a Tradition of 150 Years," at the Toledo Museum of Art, an institute founded
by Edward Drummond Libbey in 1901. Mr. John W. Keefe, then Assistant Curator at the
Museum, was to be responsible for research and organization of the exhibition, including
the writing of the catalog. In seeking to borrow rare and beautiful glass for the historic
exhibition, Mr. Keefe and I went to Boston to visit the descendants of glassworkers
families. It was during one of these trips that I first became acquainted with Louis F.
Vaupels grandson, John L. Vaupel (18991980).

A retired civil engineer, the second American-born Vaupel was most cooperative, being
well aware of the historic importance of the family collection of glass engraved by his
grandfather. The collection was most impressive, the outstanding piece being the
Masterpiece Chalice, which up to this point in time had never been out of the
familys hands. Mr. Vaupel agreed to lend the Chalice for the exhibi-tion provided
that I, personally, take the piece to Toledo and return it to Boston at the close of the
exhibition, with the Museum insuring it for $15,000. With the Vaupel Chalice as one of its
features, the Museum exhibition was a major success, well publicized both locally and
nation-ally, running from March 17 to April 7, 1968.
After my participating in the Libbey Anniversary events and visits in Boston, I decided
to compile an article which was eventually published in the May, 1971, issue of The
Magazine ANTIQUES, entitled, "Louis Vaupel, Master Glass Engraver." In preparing
the piece, the needed help from grandson John was generously given. Color illustrations
were supplied along with detailed information, requiring considerable correspondence that,
today, is of historic value. In 1972, Mr. Vaupel realized that the familys
collection of 19th Century glass should be preserved for its historic importance. When he
asked me if I could help in placing pieces in museums and private collections, we agreed
to an arrangement whereby we would share the costs of promoting the offering and I would
be given a commission on all sales for my services. Accordingly, a mailing was made to
American museums, with a detailed listing and a reprint in color of my article in The
Magazine ANTIQUES. The response was prompt and most encouraging.
At the time of this offering, our research indicated that three museums already had
examples of Vaupel engraved items in their collections: The Brooklyn Museum, The Museum of
Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts, and the Currier Gallery of Art, Manchester, New
Hampshire. These acquisitions had either been purchases or gifts, such as the pieces in
the Boston Museum, which were bequeathed to the museum by Dr. Minette D. Newman,
grand-daughter of Louis Vaupel.
Using this earliest information as the starting point, our most recent project has been
to update the survey of all Amer-ican museums having Vaupelattributed items engraved
by Louis Vaupel. Our questionnaire was mailed to some 30 museums, with returns from all of
them, indicating the overall interest in our research. Eleven museums can now be added to
the earlier three, making a total of 14 American Museums with Vaupel documented pieces.
When John Vaupel died July 20, 1980, at Boothbay, Maine, he had the satisfaction of
knowing that through his thoughtful efforts, Louis Vaupels work had been placed
quite properly in a number of American museums. No other single American glass craftsman
can match such recognition. Having assisted in obtaining this recognition has given me, as
a glass historian, much personal satisfaction.
 |
UPDATED SURVEY OF MUSEUMS HAVING VAUPEL
ENGRAVED ITEMS IN THEIR COLLECTIONS-1989 TOLEDO MUSEUM OF
ART, TOLEDO, OHIO:
Masterpiece Chalice acc.no. 74.52 (Fig. 1)
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS, BOSTON, MASS:
Goblet
acc. no. 61.1219 (Fig. 2)
Goblet
" " 61.12222 (Fig. 3)
Sugar Bowl 61. 12223
Cordial
61.12224
Cordial
61.12225
Covered Jar 1976.633
Spoon Holder 1976.729
HENRY FORD MUSEUM, DEARBORN, MICH:
Compote Beaker, Ruby acc. no. 74.126 " ~ 74.126 (Fig. 4)
NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART,NEW ORLEANS, LA:
Beaker, Green (Fig. 5)
ST. LOUIS MUSEUM OF ART, ST. LOUIS MO.:
Goblet, CoatofArms acc. no. 8.1974 (Fig. 6)
Cruet & Stopper 98.1974
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART, NEW YORK, NY:
Cruet & Stopper acc. no. 1989.159ab
CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS, CORNING, NY:
Flask acc. no. 84.3.6
PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART, PORTlAND, MAINE:
Goblet
Goblet |
BROOKLYN MUSEUM, NEW YORK, NY:
Wine acc. no. 45.143.ii
Double Perfume " " 45. 143. 11 CURRIER
GALLERY OF ART, MANCHESTER,NH:
Goblet acc. no 1942.7.189
Compote " " 1961.14.1
Goblet " 1961.14.2
Framed Scene 1971.18
Compote 1976.58
Wine " " 1979.103
HIGH MUSEUM OF ART, ATLANTA, GA:
Cruet & Stopper acc. no. 1982.290a,b
JONES MUSEUM OF GLASS & CERAMICS, EAST BALDWIN, MAINE:
No. 33 Bowl
No. 35 Bowl
No. 59 Goblet
No. 9 Mug
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART, LOS ANGELES, CALIF:
Goblet acc. no. 87.7.3
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE, WASHINGTON
D.C.:
Cruet & Stopper acc. no. 76.lOOab (Fig. 7)
|
|